Medical schools in the United States at mid-century.

"Comprises the formal report of the Survey of Medical Education."

When the library is located in prime real estate: a case study on the loss of space from the Duke University Medical Center Library and Archives.

The Duke University Medical Center Library and Archives is located in the heart of the Duke Medicine campus, surrounded by Duke Hospital, ambulatory clinics, and numerous research facilities. Its location is considered prime real estate, given its adjacency to patient care, research, and educational activities. In 2005, the Duke University Library Space Planning Committee had recommended creating a learning center in the library that would support a variety of educational activities. However, the health system needed to convert the library's top floor into office space to make way for expansion of the hospital and cancer center. The library had only five months to plan the storage and consolidation of its journal and book collections, while working with the facilities design office and architect on the replacement of key user spaces on the top floor. Library staff worked together to develop plans for storing, weeding, and consolidating the collections and provided input into renovation plans for users spaces on its mezzanine level. The library lost 15,238 square feet (29%) of its net assignable square footage and a total of 16,897 (30%) gross square feet. This included 50% of the total space allotted to collections and over 15% of user spaces. The top-floor space now houses offices for Duke Medicine oncology faculty and staff. By storing a large portion of its collection off-site, the library was able to remove more stacks on the remaining stack level and convert them to user spaces, a long-term goal for the library. Additional space on the mezzanine level had to be converted to replace lost study and conference room spaces. While this project did not match the recommended space plans for the library, it underscored the need for the library to think creatively about the future of its facility and to work toward a more cohesive master plan.

John Warren's copy of votes from a meeting of the Boston Medical Society, 1784 May 3

This document lists the eleven votes cast at a meeting of the Boston Medical Society on May 3, 1784. It was authorized as a "true coppy" by Thomas Kast, the Secretary of the Society. The following members of the Society were present at the meeting, all of them doctors: James Pecker, James Lloyd, Joseph Gardner, Samuel Danforth, Isaac Rand, Jr., Charles Jarvis, Thomas Kast, Benjamin Curtis, Thomas Welsh, Nathaniel Walker Appleton, and doctors whose last names were Adams, Townsend, Eustis, Homans, and Whitwell. The document indicates that a meeting had been held the previous evening, as well (May 2, 1784), at which the topics on which votes were taken had been discussed. The votes, eleven in total, were all related to the doctors' concerns about John Warren and his involvement with the emerging medical school (now Harvard Medical School), that school's relation to almshouses, the medical care of the poor, and other related matters. The tone and content of these votes reveals anger on the part of the members of the Boston Medical Society towards Warren. This anger appears to have stemmed from the perceived threat of Warren to their own practices, exacerbated by a vote of the Harvard Corporation on April 19, 1784. This vote authorized Warren to apply to the Overseers of the Poor for the town of Boston, requesting that students in the newly-established Harvard medical program, where Warren was Professor of Anatomy and Surgery, be allowed to visit the hospital of the almshouse with their professors for the purpose of clinical instruction. Although Warren believed that the students would learn far more from these visits, in regards to surgical experience, than they could possibly learn in Cambridge, the proposal provoked great distrust from the members of the Boston Medical Society, who accused Warren of an "attempt to direct the public medical business from its usual channels" for his own financial and professional gain.

Classified list of medical colleges in the United States /

"Reprinted from the Journal of the American Medical Association January 18, 1913."

A comparative view of the schools of physic of Dublin and Edinburgh.

Mode of access: Internet.

Características de las facultades de medicina de Colombia después de la ley 30 de 1992, año 2006.

En 1992 se promulgóla Ley 30 que regula la educación superior en Colombia. Esta Ley propicióun incremento significativo de la oferta educativa en todas las áreas, incluyendo ciencias de la salud. Las facultades de medicina se incrementaron en casi un 150%, pasando de 21 a 52 en este momento; la calidad de esta oferta educativa es motivo de preocupación por parte de la comunidad médica.

Multimediale, interaktive und patientennahe Lehrszenarien in der medizinischen Ausbildung

MeduMobile ist ein im Rahmen der Ausschreibung „Notebook-University“ vom bmb+f gefördertes Projekt. Ziel des Projektes ist es, die Ausbildung am Krankenbett im Medizinstudium zu verbessern, indem bestimmte Lehrveranstaltungen mit Hilfe von WLAN und Notebook ubiquitär auf dem Campus verfügbar gemacht werden. Hierzu werden neue, so genannte OnCall-Lehrszenarien entwickelt und erprobt, bei denen die auf Abruf bereit stehenden Medizinstudierenden alarmiert und zur Teilnahme gebeten werden, wenn akute und/oder seltene Fälle in die Klinik eingeliefert werden. Die Studierenden nehmen aktiv an den vielfach interdisziplinären Lehrveranstaltungen teil. Der Unterricht findet vor, während und nach der Live-Session statt. Der Hochschullehrer und die Studierenden können den Fall gemeinsam besprechen und die Diagnose bzw. Therapie u.a. an Hand bildgebender Verfahren (CT, Mikroskop, Röntgen, Ultraschall, ...) erarbeiten. Parallel dazu können die Studierenden Lehrmaterialen aus multimedialen Datenbanken, Medline und Internet nutzen sowie eigene Videokonferenzen für die Gruppenarbeit einsetzen. Eine solche Lehrveranstaltung kann somit mehrere didaktische Elemente beinhalten: instruktives, konstruktives, kognitives und kooperatives Lernen. An der Erprobung nehmen etwa 80 Studierende an Veranstaltungen aus 8 Fachgebieten teil. Es werden Studien zur Evaluation des didaktischen Mehrwerts sowie technischer und organisatorischer Qualität durchgeführt. Endgültige Ergebnisse werden Ende 2003 vorliegen.(DIPF/Orig.)

Changing learning to improve practice : hand hygiene education in Queensland medical schools

The aim of Queensland Health’s ‘Clean hands are life savers’ program is to change the culture and behaviour of healthcare workers related to hand hygiene. Hand hygiene is considered to be the most effective means of preventing pathogen cross-transmission and healthcare-associated infections. Most hospitals throughout Queensland as well as Australia now manage a hand hygiene program to increase the hand hygiene compliance of all healthcare workers. Reports taken from routine hand hygiene observations reveal that doctors are usually less compliant in their hand-washing practices than other healthcare worker groups. The Centre for Healthcare Related Infection Surveillance and Prevention (CHRISP) has attempted to have an impact on this challenging group through their Medical Leadership Initiative. With education as a core component of the program, efforts were made to ensure our future doctors were receiving information that aligned with Queensland Health standards during their formative years at medical school. CHRISP met with university instructors to understand what infection prevention education was currently included in the curriculum and support the introduction of new learning activities that specifically focused on hand hygiene. This prompted change to the existing curriculum and a range of interventions were employed with mixed success. Although met with challenges, methods to integrate more infection prevention teaching were found.

Comparison of North American universities with and without medical schools and their technology transfer initiatives

Empirical research available on technology transfer initiatives is either North American or European. Literature over the last two decades shows various research objectives such as identifying the variables to be measured and statistical methods to be used in the context of studying university based technology transfer initiatives. AUTM survey data from years 1996 to 2008 provides insightful patterns about the North American technology transfer initiatives, we use this data in our paper. This paper has three sections namely, a comparison of North American Universities with (n=1129) and without Medical Schools (n=786), an analysis of the top 75th percentile of these samples and a DEA analysis of these samples. We use 20 variables. Researchers have attempted to classify university based technology transfer initiative variables into multi-stages, namely, disclosures, patents and license agreements. Using the same approach, however with minor variations, three stages are defined in this paper. The first stage is to do with inputs from R&D expenditure and outputs namely, invention disclosures. The second stage is to do with invention disclosures being the input and patents issued being the output. The third stage is to do with patents issued as an input and technology transfers as outcomes.